process

401k Trends for 2022

As we head into the fall and prepare for the 2022 plan year, here is a list of our 4 top retirement plan trends that we are implementing with our clients.

1. Inflation

Over the past several months, we have seen an increase in inflation in many sectors of the economy. While the Federal Reserve has said that the inflation we are experiencing now is temporary, there is no hiding the fact that we are near a 40 year low in interest rates.

Bonds are typically held in a portfolio with the goal to reduce volatility and provide a baseline income level in a proper asset allocation strategy. However, bond prices move in an adverse relationship to their yield. As a result, bond prices go down as yields rise, resulting in potential losses in an investor’s portfolio.

Not all Bonds have the same sensitivity to rising rates

There are many reasons why bond yields may rise, but not all bond prices will react the same to a rise in interest rates. Some bonds, such as inflation-indexed bonds, will increase their coupon rate as inflation rises, reducing pressure on the bond’s price to go down. Traditional bonds typically used in retirement plans tend to be more sensitive to rising rates, such as intermediate corporate bonds.

What you can do to help your participants

We have been adding in additional exposure to our lineups that include less traditional bond funds for some time. Funds such as inflation-protected and multi-sector bond funds may offer your participants flexibility to adapt to rising rates.

2. Taking Control of Plan Data

This year there have been several high-profile data breaches in the news. As more and more of your plan data gets placed online, Plan sponsors need to be aware of their exposure to potential data breach liability through internal systems and vendors.

In February of this year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recommended that the DOL formally state whether it is a fiduciary’s responsibility to mitigate cybersecurity risks in DC plans and establish minimum expectations for addressing cybersecurity risks in DC plans.

For its part, the DOL Addressed the second part of the request by releasing three pieces of guidance relating to best practices concerning: Hiring a Service Provider, Cybersecurity, and Online Security tips.

Plan Sponsors in their role as fiduciaries should begin to adopt cybersecurity best practices in anticipation of the DOL guidance that may make a failure to secure participant data a fiduciary breach.

Participant data may be a liability even if it is not "stolen"

We have seen a rising number of court filings and lawsuits alleging that service providers that utilize plan and participant data to sell other products are doing so in breach of fiduciary duty. In most cases, including the high-profile NYU case, the plaintiffs typically claim that recordkeepers were using their access to participant demographic data to sell lucrative financial instruments without compensating the plan for that use. To date, we have not seen any of these allegations be successful. However, not all the lawsuits in question have worked their way through the appeals process.

Plan Sponsors would be wise to take heed and start asking better questions of their service providers and their use of participant data to sell ancillary products to their participants.

3. Personalized Education and Advice

When used correctly by the plan, Participant data can be a valuable tool to identify and communicate with plan participants actions and advice independent of the services available from their recordkeeper.

Plans of all sizes utilize participant data to identify underperforming demographic cohorts to customize advice at scale in their retirement plans. Some of the programs we are seeing plan data participant data include:

  • Financial Wellness Programs
  • Financial Coaching
  • Managed Accounts/Personalized recommendations
  • Plan Health Reports

As discussed earlier, it is vital to have a formal plan whenever sharing participant data and ensuring that the data is used in the best interest of plan participants. However, as software and third-party services become more sophisticated and available, it may make sense to use participant data beyond the off-the-shelf services provided by some recordkeepers.

4. Missing and Low Balance Participants

Missing participants continues to be a topic of emphasis for IRS, DOL, and EBSA regulators. The primary duty of any fiduciary is to provide benefits to plan participants when due. Integral to that responsibility is for plan sponsors to know whom they owe benefits to and how to reach them for communicating vital Plan information.

Before 2014 the IRS had a program that you could use to forward mail to missing participants. However, since that program has terminated, there is no easy solution to finding missing participants. The DOL has issued guidance in January providing best practices for Plan Fiduciaries, including:

  • Maintaining accurate census information for the plan’s participant population
  • Implementing effective communication strategies
  • Missing participant searches
  • Documenting procedures and actions

Examples of participant searches include:

  • Checking related Plan and employer records
  • Checking with designated Plan beneficiaries
  • Using free online searches
  • Using a commercial locator service
  • USPS certified mail features
  • Death and social security searches
  • Reaching out to colleagues who worked with the person in the past.

Use force-out provision to remove low balance participants annually

One way to reduce your burden on locating missing participants is to regularly force out terminated participants with low balances while you are still in contact with them. Most plan documents have a provision that allows them to force out low-balance participants through a systematic process if their balance is below $5,000.

Most recordkeepers can automatically force out low-balance participants regularly through an automatic IRA provider and are more than happy to do that. However, we have found that few plans that come to us are taking advantage of this service. If your provider does offer this service, sign up or consider using one of the third-party providers who can provide that service free of charge.

If your provider doesn’t have a solid process for finding missing participants or forcing out low-balance participants, there are several third-party providers that we have worked with who can do a great job.

Remember to keep good documentation when forcing low-balance participants out of the plan. Often, the participant can easily miss the required notices alerting them to the forced-out distribution. As a result, the participant may be unaware that the plan transferred their account. Your responsibility is to keep a copy of any communications sent in their employee file or other safe location that can easily be referenced years into the future.

Conclusion

If you’d like to talk about any of these trends for your plan, please call us today.

 

This information is not intended as authoritative guidance or tax or legal advice.  You should consult your attorney or tax advisor for guidance on your specific situation.  In no way does advisor assure that, by using the information, plan sponsor will be in compliance with ERISA regulations. 

Utilizing ESG in your Retirement Plan

Recently the EBSA division of the Department of Labor (DOL) released a proposal that was largely viewed as discouraging the use of Environmental, Social or Governance (ESG, or Socially Responsible Investing) factors as due diligence in ERISA based defined contribution retirement plans.

In the DOL’s proposal Secretary of Labor Eugene Scalia said “Private employer-sponsored retirement plans are not vehicles for furthering social goals or policy objectives that are not in the financial interest of the plan. Rather, ERISA plans should be managed with unwavering focus on a single, very important social goal: providing for the retirement security of American workers.”

How did we get here?

ESG investing has been a hot topic of late and more plan fiduciaries that we speak with are considering utilizing ESG considerations in their due diligence process.  We feel that there is a place for ESG but selecting funds based on ESG factors must not be taken lightly.  In recent years there have been several interpretive bulletins and one Field Assistance Bulletin (FAB 2018-01) outlining the DOL’s guidance around selecting and monitoring plan investments as they relate to ESG factors: 

FAB 2018-01 consolidated past guidance that said that ERISA fiduciaries may not sacrifice investment returns or assume greater investment risks as a means of promoting collateral social policy goals. 

  • IB 2015-01[1]
    • Fiduciaries can not sacrifice investment return or take additional risk for collateral Social Policy Goals
    • Fiduciaries can use ESG as a tie-breaker for investment choice.
    • Adding an ESG alternative to the lineup as an additional asset class is acceptable if it doesn’t forgo adding other non-ESG themed investment options to the platform.
    • Nothing in the QDIA regulation suggests that fiduciaries should choose QDIAs based on collateral public policy goals.
      • For example, the selection of a ESG-themed target date fund as a QDIA would not be prudent if the fund would provide a lower expected rate of return than available non-ESG alternative target date funds with commensurate degrees of risk, or if the fund would be riskier than non-ESG alternative available target date funds with commensurate rates of return.
    • IB 2016-01[2]
      • Investment Policy Statements are permitted but not required to include policies concerning the use of ESG factors to evaluate investments.
      • If an IPS contains language for evaluating funds based on ESG factors, there is nothing stating that fiduciaries must always adhere to them.
      • Plan fiduciaries should not incur substantial expenditure of plan assets to actively engage with management on environmental or social factors, either directly or through the plan’s investment managers.

DOL new proposed rules

The new DOL proposal goes further to add five core new additions to the regulations[3]:

  • New regulatory text to codify the Department’s longstanding position that ERISA requires plan fiduciaries to select investments and investment courses of action based on financial considerations relevant to the risk-adjusted economic value of a particular investment or investment course of action.
  • An express regulatory provision stating that compliance with the exclusive-purpose (i.e., loyalty) duty in ERISA section 404(a)(1)(A) prohibits fiduciaries from subordinating the interests of plan participants and beneficiaries in retirement income and financial benefits under the plan to non-pecuniary goals.
  • A new provision that requires fiduciaries to consider other available investments to meet their prudence and loyalty duties under ERISA.
  • The proposal acknowledges that ESG factors can be pecuniary factors, but only if they present economic risks or opportunities that qualified investment professionals would treat as material economic considerations under generally accepted investment theories. The proposal adds new regulatory text on required investment analysis and documentation requirements in the rare circumstances when fiduciaries are choosing among truly economically “indistinguishable” investments.
  • A new provision on selecting designated investment alternatives for 401(k)-type plans. The proposal reiterates the Department’s view that the prudence and loyalty standards set forth in ERISA apply to a fiduciary’s selection of an investment alternative to be offered to plan participants and beneficiaries in an individual account plan (commonly referred to as a 401(k)-type plan). The proposal describes the requirements for selecting investment alternatives for such plans that purport to pursue one or more environmental, social, and corporate governance-oriented objectives in their investment mandates or that include such parameters in the fund name.

Exclusive Purpose Rule

It is important to always remember that ERISA requires that fiduciaries operate the plan for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants and paying reasonable plan expenses. If a plan committee is going to use ESG as a criteria for it’s selection and monitoring of funds it is important to keep a few rules in mind:

  • Your process must always start with a prudent review of performance, risk and cost factors to select suitable investment options.
  • ESG factors that are pecuniary in nature can be taken into account to the extent that they present economic risks or opportunities that qualified investment professionals would treat as material economic considerations under generally accepted investment theories. ESG factors can not be weighted more heavily than non-ESG factors. 
  • ESG may be used as a tie-breaker in the event that two investments are “economically indistinguishable”.
    • Keep in mind that the proposed regulation requires new investment analysis and documentation requirements in the rare instance when fiduciaries are choosing among truly economically indistinguishable investments.
  • ESG criteria should not be a consideration in the selection of a QDIA investment.

Where do we go from here?

The new rule proposed by the EBSA is just that, a proposed rule.  There is still a long way to go before it becomes a regulation and these issues tend to be political and can change under different administrations. However, a solid foundation of procedural prudence and keeping the focus on participants’ successful retirement outcomes can be achieved by thoughtful integration of ESG factors into your investment selection process.  Remember to document your decisions and always ensure that first and foremost that the investment selection that you are making does not sacrifice investment return, increase costs or assume additional risk.  

Have questions about your process relating to ESG in your retirement plan?  Email Elazzari@401kimpact.com for an online consultation.

[1] Source: DOL, IB 2015-01,  accessed July 9, 2020,
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/10/26/2015-27146/interpretive-bulletin-relating-to-the-fiduciary-standard-under-erisa-in-considering-economically,

[2] Source: DOL, IB 2016-01, accessed July 9, 2020.
https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/legacy-files/ebsa/2016-31515.pdf

[3] Source: DOL, “U.S. Department of Labor Proposes New Investment Duties Rule,” accessed July 9, 2020,

https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/ebsa/ebsa20200623

This information is not intended as authoritative guidance or tax or legal advice. You should consult your attorney or tax advisor for guidance on your specific situation. In no way does advisor assure that, by using the information provided, plan sponsor will be in compliance with ERISA regulations. An Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) fund’s policy could cause it to perform differently compared to funds that do not have such a policy

Evaluating Your Fiduciary Process

Evaluating Your Fiduciary Process

Believe it or not, an efficient retirement plan committee does not happen by chance. The “best practices” your committee upholds form the foundation for a prudent fiduciary process creating an opportunity for employees to pursue their retirement goals. Companies of any size can benefit from a consistent process and should consider implementing a few of the tips below.

Evaluate What’s Established

If you have a company 401k plan and you are on the retirement committee, then you are a plan fiduciary. As such, you have many duties and responsibilities to uphold to help support plan compliance to the benefit of your company and the plan participants.  This is a great opportunity. However, is there more you can do to help limit liability and create a track for retirement readiness?

It’s more than likely you have a process in place to monitor and manage the company retirement plan; but with this process in place, have you been able to:

  • Measure the success of your plan?
  • Evaluate provider relationships and plan services and fees?
  • Limit liability?

If this doesn’t evoke a confident answer, let’s take a step back and review how you can create a repeatable process.

Process, Process, Process

Creating a repeatable process can help limit liability by demonstrating that you have carried out your responsibilities properly by documenting the procedures used and the thought process involved to fulfill your fiduciary duties.[1] Additionally, a well put together and effective retirement plan committee is the foundation of successful fiduciary decision-making and organizational risk management for plans of all sizes.[2]

Choosing the right team

First things first, who is on your team? If you’ve assembled a committee team, it may include a business owner, CEO, CFO, President, Human Resources Managers, and/or other professional colleagues. Surprisingly, members of your retirement plan committee don’t need to be experts in retirement or investing; however, they should be committed to the task and have a reputation for making good decisions.2

Documenting

Within your team, you must delegate roles and begin documenting all plan actions and why they are prudent. Proper documentation serves as proof that the committee’s responsibilities are being prudently executed.[3]

Here are some of what the retirement plan committee’s minutes should include:3

  • List of all party’s present with identification of roles
  • Description of all issues considered at the meeting
  • Documentation of all materials reviewed during the meeting
  • Documentation of all decisions made and the analysis and logic supporting each

Identification of any topics to

The Prudent On-going Process

Once your committee is in motion, it’s time to start the on-going process of monitoring, reviewing, and evaluating information. When you review your company retirement plan, create a checklist of the following:

  • Gather all plan related documents
  • Create folders
  • Read through and understand the information
  • Ask team members to assist if needed

Once the delegated committee member has reviewed the plan, it’s time to evaluate provider relationships and plan services. Consider evaluating retirement readiness, plan administration, costs, investments, and service providers.

As your committee monitors the plan, ask yourself and the team members one important question: How could you make your company’s retirement plan offering better? Some suggestions could be fiduciary advisor investment review, fee benchmarking, auto enrollment, and auto escalation.

Maintenance within the Retirement Committee

Providing Fiduciary Training

As mentioned, your committee isn’t required to have retirement and investment experts. That being said, it is crucial to provide fiduciary training so they can be educated and fully equipped to serve on the retirement plan committee. Key areas to cover should include the definition of a fiduciary under ERISA, the basic duties and responsibilities required, fiduciary best practices, investment considerations and prudent process, and an overview of current legal and regulatory trends.[4]

How Often Should a Committee Meet per Year?

Industry experts suggest meeting 2-4 times per year: formal meetings should occur on a regular basis and should not take more than 1-2 hours if well-organized.4 Scheduling meeting at the beginning of the year tends to be effective for all parties.  One idea is to pre-schedule and put the placeholder dates on their calendars so you have the meetings calendared and set for the year.

Looking Forward

Why should you evaluate your fiduciary process? As retirement plan committee members, you want your employees to reach a successful retirement, so always focus on the outcomes. Additionally, having a compliant plan can limit your liability as a plan sponsor. Lastly, ERISA is about process! The committee needs to keep repeating, refining, and improving the company’s retirement plan; because at the end of the day, you want all of your employees to win at retirement.

 

Skip to content